Level 2

Company Announcements

September 2017 Quarterly Report

By LSE RNS

RNS Number : 9937U
Salt Lake Potash Limited
31 October 2017
 

31 October 2017

 

AIM/ASX Code: SO4

 

SALT LAKE POTASH LIMITED

September 2017 Quarterly Report

The Board of Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company or SLP) is pleased to present its Quarterly Report for the period ending 30 September 2017.

During the quarter, the Company achieved a very important milestone of completing successful validation of the final major technical foundations for production of Sulphate of Potash (SOP) from the Goldfields Salt Lake Potash Project (GSLP).

Highlights for the quarter and subsequently include:

LAKE WELLS

Evaporation Pond Testwork

Ø The Company successfully completed field trials testing its on-lake, unlined evaporation pond model, which will result in significant capital cost advantages for the GSLP.

Ø Comprehensive geological and geotechnical investigation confirms the widespread availability of ideal in-situ clay materials ideal for use in evaporation pond construction. Modelling based on geotechnical properties of the clays confirms the potential to build unlined, on-lake ponds with negligible seepage inefficiency.

Ø Amec Foster Wheeler estimate that comparative costs for 400ha of on-lake ponds are $1.6m (unlined) and $42.2m (HDPE lined), highlighting a significant capex advantage for the Project.

Process Testwork

Ø The Company completed a comprehensive testwork program at globally recognised potash process consultants, Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) that validated and refined the parameters used in the process plant flowsheet for the GSLP. Importantly, the testwork was conducted on a 60kg representative sample of kainite harvest salt produced on site at Lake Wells.

Ø SRC will conduct further optimisation tests followed by a continuous locked cycle operation, to produce significant quantities of flotation product and SOP for further testing and marketing.

Ø The Site Evaporation Trial (SET) at Lake Wells has now processed approximately 243 tonnes of brine and produced over 5 tonnes of harvest salts.

Surface Aquifer Characterisation and Deep Aquifer Exploration

Ø The Company continued sustained pump tests on test trenches across Lake Wells, providing reliable data for the surface aquifer hydrogeological model for Lake Wells. 

Ø The Company mobilised an on-lake drill rig to test deep aquifer characteristics and identify potential high yield portions of the basal aquifer.

Demonstration Plant

Ø The Company and its consultants have substantially advanced the Demonstration Plant study for the GSLP.

 

LAKE BALLARD

Ø An initial surface aquifer exploration program was completed at Lake Ballard, comprising a total of 160 shallow test pits and 10 test trenches. This work provides preliminary data for the geological and hydrological models for the surface aquifer of the Lake, as well as brine, geological and geotechnical samples. 

LAKE IRWIN

Ø A surface aquifer exploration program has commenced at Lake Irwin with the mobilisation of an excavator to undertake an initial campaign of test pit and trench installation. The Company also collected further bulk brine samples for evaporation and process testwork.

The Company's primary focus is to construct a Demonstration Plant at the GSLP, intended to be the first salt-lake brine SOP production operation in Australia. While proceeding with the analysis of options to construct a 20,000-40,000tpa SOP Demonstration Plant at Lake Wells, the Company is also exploring the other lakes in the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project, starting with Lake Ballard and Lake Irwin.

 

LAKE WELLS

Evaporation Ponds Construction Trial

The Company completed an evaporation pond trial under site conditions at Lake Wells. The field trial involved construction and testing of four test ponds on the Lake Wells Playa, built solely from in-situ clay materials, using a standard 30t excavator, which operated efficiently and effectively on the lake playa. The trial achieved levels of brine seepage from the evaporation ponds well below the threshold for successful operation of halite evaporation ponds, and potentially also for the smaller potassium salt harvest ponds. (for complete details see Stock Exchange announcement dated 16 October 2017)

The capex savings from this construction method are substantial, compared to the alternative of plastic lined ponds. SLP's engineering consultant, Amec Foster Wheeler, estimates the cost of lined ponds to be approximately $10.50 per m2, up to 25 times higher than construction costs for unlined ponds.

The 25m x 25m test ponds were designed by SLP's geotechnical consultant, MHA Geotechnical (MHA), to test the constructability and operating performance of a number of pond wall designs and to provide reliable seepage data under site conditions. The observed brine loss in the test ponds was well within the parameters of the hydrodynamic model, indicating losses for a 400ha pond will be below 0.125mm/day.

The Company has identified several opportunities to improve the construction of commercial scale ponds using excavators, along with ancillary equipment to optimize drying and compaction of the clays utilized in pond wall construction. This should result in further improvements in the already very low seepage observed in the trial sized ponds.

SLP plans to now construct an 18ha Pilot scale pond system to further improve the pond design and construction model.

 

 

Test Pond Results

Test Pond 3 (TP3) represents the as-modelled embankment construction and is the most likely design for commercial scale embankments. A total of 32 piezometric standpipes and 12 water data loggers were installed in and around all four walls of TP3, along with water level measuring devices on the floor of the pond and in the surrounding trenches, to accurately measure the water levels both in the pond and within the embankments.

The embankment and key are constructed from clay which has been air-dried prior to compaction to ensure target compaction and permeability are achieved.  After the embankment and key material is saturated, the seepage from the pond, net of brine evaporation (data from the control pond) represents seepage losses through and below the pond walls. Net seepage losses of less than 3mm per day at test pond scale will substantially validate the shallow lake lithology, geotechnical characteristics and pond construction model for production scale, clay lined, on-lake halite evaporation ponds.

TP3 was initially filled with lake brine to approximately 500mm on 29 August 2017. The small, plastic lined, control pond was also filled to provide an accurate measure of evaporation rates.

Water level and piezometer readings were taken twice daily since and on 18 September 2017 the ponds were topped up, TP3 to approximately 1,000mm in this case, to accelerate wall saturation.

Since initial brine fill, the average net seepage at TP3 equated to approximately 2.4mm per day. This figure includes "losses" to wall saturation as well as to seepage, indicating that steady state seepage losses are  comfortably below the 3mm per day threshold modelled for this scale of pond.

Capital Cost Comparison

The Company's engineering consultants, Amec Foster Wheeler, have generated scoping level cost estimates comparing two pond construction options for a 400ha halite pond. For ponds built on-lake on a relatively flat playa, with no provision for salt harvesting, and a 2.0m high wall, Amec Foster Wheeler estimate direct capital costs (accuracy of -10%/+30%) of:

·        Unlined -  A$1.6m

·        Lined - A$42.2m

The main costs of the lined ponds are the supply and installation of HDPE lining and placement and compaction of a sand bedding layer. If similar ponds were constructed off lake then clearing and levelling costs would be additional.

For either lined or unlined ponds, if salt harvesting is required a layer of halite must first be deposited and compacted, to provide a support base for harvesting equipment. As the Company does not plan to harvest halite from its ponds, these costs are not included in the Amec Foster Wheeler analysis.

Process Testwork

 

The Company continues a range of process development testwork to enhance the Lake Wells process model.

Site Evaporation Trial

A large scale, continuous Site Evaporation Trial (SET) at Lake Wells successfully completed 12 months of operation under site conditions and through all seasons, confirming the solar evaporation pathway for production of potassium rich harvest salts for processing into SOP. The objective of the SET was to refine process design criteria for the halite evaporation ponds and subsequent harvest salt ponds.

 

The SET has processed approximately 243 tonnes of Lake Wells brine and produced 5.3 tonnes of harvest salts.

The results of the SET are Australian first and have provided significant knowledge to the Company on the salt crystallisation pathway under site conditions in Australia. 

 

During the quarter, approximately 54t of Lake Wells brine was processed through both trains of the SET, producing approximately 2,100kg of harvest salt at average potassium grades within target parameters. Production levels increased as the temperature (evaporation rates) increased transitioning out of winter into spring.

The large quantity of salt produced via the SET is available for larger scale production of commercial samples for potential customers and partners around the world.

 

Process Testwork -  Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC)

The Company completed testwork at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) in Saskatchewan, Canada. SRC is a recognized global leader in potash process metallurgical testing. SRC's Minerals team has the facilities and expertise to design and perform potash processing and metallurgical testing work for the potash industry worldwide. (for complete details see Stock Exchange announcement dated 14 September 2017)

The objective of the SRC testwork was to validate and refine the process parameters used in the production model and process flowsheet at the Company's GSLP. These process parameters were designed by the Company's metallurgical consultants, based on experience overseas and results for GSLP lab testwork in the USA and Australia.

The testwork program was designed to improve the Company's understanding of the processing plant component of the operation using actual Harvest Salts produced from Lake Wells brines under site conditions. These Harvest Salts differ from salts produced in laboratory evaporation trials and provide a much more representative basis from which to develop an economic process route.

 

The testwork program was designed and managed by the Company and international brine-processing expert Mr Carlos Perucca of Carlos Perucca Processing Consulting Ltd (CPPC).

Overall Potassium Recovery

Single pass SOP conversion from schoenite, including recovery of schoenite from the conversion  brine, was calculated as 39.7% in the SRC lab, with the remaining schoenite recycling to the kainite decomposition reactors to recover potassium.

Tests were carried out on recovery of residual potassium from excess flotation brine as kainite, with a 98.2% recovery of potassium from this stream achievable, which is recycled to the plant feed.

This results in an overall potassium recovery of up to 92%, depending on the flotation option and brine handling methods employed in the process development. This compares favourably with performance parameters included in the mass balance models which the Company has generated for its feasibility studies. Future mass balance models will be refined to reflect the SRC results.

The results achieved at SRC compare very favourably to the specifications of products marketed as SOP for agricultural use worldwide where average potassium assays range from 50% to 52% as K2O and sulphate assays range from 52% to 54% as SO4.

Carlos Perucca of CPPC commented on the SRC results "I am extremely pleased with the results of the SRC testwork and the implied potential for an efficient SOP production process at the Goldfields Salt Lake Project.  In my experience the potential recovery indicated by this work is at the high end of recoveries of other SOP operations worldwide."

Next Steps and Process Validation

 

The work completed by SRC has highlighted several opportunities for further refinement and development of the GSLP SOP process.

 

SRC has commenced further optimisation tests to validate and duplicate the results achieved to date, followed by a locked-cycle continuous production test to test brine recycle assumptions and obtain product purity information on a continuous basis.

 

The locked-cycle test will also provide a significant quantity of flotation product to allow crystalliser vendor testing and design work, and also SOP product for product testing and commercial purposes.

Conclusions

The work completed at SRC to date has shown:

·     Minimal comminution is required to liberate salts for flotation;

·     Kainite destruction achieves high conversion to schoenite in 2 hours at ambient conditions;

·     Both direct and reverse flotation provide viable flow sheet options for further investigation;

·     Potassium recovery in flotation is high with up to 97.1% achieved in reverse flotation;

·     Both reverse and direct flotation  options present the opportunity to make a second saleable MgSO4 product with minimal additional processing;

·     SOP conversion produces high purity (>98%) SOP with a 1.5 hour residence time; and

·     Global potassium recovery for the process plant may be as high as 92% depending on the flotation option and brine recycle philosophy selected.

Further work is underway to further refine parameters to feed into Pre-Feasibility Study level studies on both the commercial operation and the Demonstration Plant.

Surface Aquifer Exploration Program

The Company has completed a substantial program of work investigating the geological and hydrogeological attributes of the Shallow Lake Bed Sediment hosted brine resource at Lake Wells. The information and data generated will be utilised in the design of the brine extraction system for the GSLP Pilot Plant.

The total program includes 250 test pits and 10 trenches over the lake playa. The test pits are generally 1m wide x 1.5m long and 4.5m deep and confirm lithology and permeability of upper lake bed sediments and demonstrate spatial continuity of the surface aquifer. 

Long Term Test Pumping

The Company continued sustained pump tests on three test trenches across Lake Wells. This work provides reliable data for the preparation of a surface aquifer hydrogeological model for Lake Wells. 

The testing was conducted as a "constant head test" whereby flow rate was adjusted to maintain a constant trench water level. Drawdown was observed at nearby observation bores placed at distances of 10m, 20m and 50m from the trench.

Trench dimensions and pumping test results are presented in Table 1.  Trench length varied from 25m to 50m length. Trench depth was constrained by the capacity of the excavator and the stability of the ground conditions and ranged from 2.2m to 4m below ground surface.

Average flow rates over the duration of testing ranged from 28 to 64m3/day. Higher flow rates are associated with evaporite deposits in the Playa Sediments.

These results are very encouraging and continue to support the design of the SOP operation at Lake Wells.

Hole Id

Depth

Trench Length

Test Duration

Total Volume Pumped

Average Pumping Rate

Final Pumping Rate

Brine Chemistry

(m)

(m)

(days)

(m3)

(m3/day)

(m3/day)

(K mg/L)

Trench P2a

2.2

25

9.7

272

28

31

6,055

Trench P2b

2.8

25

7

378

54

25

4,762

Trench P2c

3.5

25

10

638

64

50

4,355

Table 1: Summary of Trench Test Pumping

Brine chemistry was consistent throughout the duration of the test with the potassium concentrations.

Deep Aquifer Exploration Program

During the quarter, the Company mobilised to Lake Wells a dual mud rotary/diamond drill rig with the capacity to operate on-lake, to complete a drill program on selected on-lake drill targets generated from modelled gravimetric and passive seismic geophysics and a review of existing drilling data. The focus of the on-lake drilling scope is to expand the current geological and aquifer knowledge of the deeper brine aquifer located in the thalweg of the Lake Wells paleochannel.

Process Water

The Company completed an Electromagnetic (EM) geophysical survey to delineate low-salinity groundwater resource for process water at Lake Wells at four prospective areas associated with the upper or shallow aquifer comprised of alluvium, colluvium and calcrete. This geophysical survey targeted the upper 20 to 30 m, in contrast with previous surveys targeting the deeper palaeochannel (deep aquifer).

The EM survey successfully identified a number of drill locations which the Company plans to test in due course.

Aboriginal Heritage and Native Title

Subsequent to the end of the quarter the Company conducted a third aboriginal heritage survey with senior heritage consultants and anthropologists, focussed on the southern area of Lake Wells, where an SOP operation is likely to be located. The survey cleared the Company's current working areas and also highlighted a number of areas of potential heritage value, which it was agreed the Company would avoid in its future operations and work programs.

Subsequent to the end of the quarter the Company was notified of a potential Native Title Claim which includes part of the northern end of Lake Wells. The claim has not yet been registered and the Company will be advised of further details if and when registration occurs, after which the Company would enter discussions with the claimants. However, the Company has completed its major exploration programs in the area and has no current intention of working in the northern part of the Lake, so the claim has no impact on the Company's operations for the time being.

A Heritage Information Submission Form pertaining to the Lake Ballard and Lake Marmion area was lodged with the department of Aboriginal Affairs by a third party. The Company has previously completed two heritage surveys with senior heritage consultants and anthropologists experienced in the area. Accordingly, SLP responded with a Notice under Section 18 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1973 in order to have the 'proposed site' assessed by the Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee.

Demonstration Plant

As announced on 20 April 2017, Amec Foster Wheeler have been engaged to prepare an analysis of the alternatives for the Company to construct a Demonstration Plant at the GSLP.

International brine and salt processing experts Carlos Perucca Processing Consulting Ltd (CPPC) and AD Infinitum Ltd (AD Infinitum) are also engaged for the Study.

Substantial progress continues on pond and trench design, mass balance modelling, process flowsheet design, major equipment quotations, costings and transportation alternative studies.

LAKE BALLARD

Surface Aquifer Exploration Program

An initial surface aquifer exploration program was undertaken at Lake Ballard, comprising a total of 160 shallow test pits and 10 test trenches. This work provides preliminary data for the hydrogeological model for the surface aquifer of the Lake, geological and geotechnical information for the upper strata of the Lake and deeper brine samples than previously available.

From the 160 test pits completed in the eastern portion of Lake Ballard revealed a varied (but typical) salt lake playa stratigraphy. The first three test pit transects on the eastern most part of the Lake, to a depth of 3.5m, encountered clayey lacustrine sediments with minor groundwater inflows; however, a number of test pits also encountered higher groundwater inflow associated with zones of indurated and laminated clayey sediments and karstic hardpan. Short-term groundwater inflows associated with test pits in the hardpan are between 10 to 15 L/sec.

Deeper test pits to a depth of 6m were subsequently completed on two transects further east on  Lake Ballard, with similar variability in stratigraphy and distribution of the high-yielding hardpan. Despite considerable efforts, the hardpan could not be fully penetrated with excavations being limited to its upper 0.5m, however, groundwater inflows were still significant resulting in rapid inundation of test pits. The stratigraphy is dominated by low-yielding laminated clayey sediments that become indurated with depth; however, there is moderate groundwater inflow associated with evaporative sand horizons that are distributed through the clayey sequence.

Further test pit investigations are proposed to better resolve the distribution of the hardpan and assess the long-term yield potential of the upper stratigraphy for trench development.

Brine was sampled during the excavation process. Brine concentrations from 59 assays from test pits ranged from 1,300 to 2,200 mg/L. The data are presented as Appendix 3.

The Company will now interpret the lithological logs from the test pits and trenches to provide a standardised stratigraphy continuing its assessment of brine extraction potential via trenching, as well as assessing the suitability of the clay lithologies for pond construction. Initial visual interpretation during the excavation process indicated excellent stratigraphy and geotechnical potential similar to results at Lake Wells.

LAKE IRWIN

Surface Aquifer Exploration Program

After completion of the initial surface aquifer exploration program at Lake Ballard, the Company mobilised the excavator to Lake Irwin to gather geological and hydrological data about the shallow brine aquifer hosted by the Quaternary Alluvium stratigraphic sequence in the upper levels of that Lake.

 

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, or Mineral Resources for Lake Wells and Lake Ballard is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of  mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to Process Testwork Results is based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM, a 'Recognised Professional Organisation' (RPO) included in a list promulgated by the ASX from time to time. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Jones consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Table 2 - Summary of Exploration and Mining Tenements

As at 30 September 2017, the Company holds interests in the following tenements:

Australian Projects:

Project

Status

Type of Change

License Number

Area       (km2)

Term

Grant Date

Date of First Relinquish-ment

Interest (%)

1-Jul-17

Interest

 (%)

30-Sep-17

Western Australia









Lake Wells










Central

Granted

-

E38/2710

192.2

5 years

05-Sep-12

4-Sep-17

100%

100%

South

Granted

-

E38/2821

131.5

5 years

19-Nov-13

18-Nov-18

100%

100%

North

Granted

-

E38/2824

198.2

5 years

04-Nov-13

3-Nov-18

100%

100%

Outer East

Granted

-

E38/3055

298.8

5 years

16-Oct-15

16-Oct-20

100%

100%

Single Block

Granted

-

E38/3056

3.0

5 years

16-Oct-15

16-Oct-20

100%

100%

Outer West

Granted

-

E38/3057

301.9

5 years

16-Oct-15

16-Oct-20

100%

100%

North West

Granted

-

E38/3124

39.0

5 years

30-Nov-16

29-Nov-21

100%

100%

West

Granted

-

L38/262

113.0

20 years

3-Feb-17

2-Feb-38

100%

100%

East

Granted

-

L38/263

28.6

    20 years

3-Feb-17

2-Feb-38

100%

100%

South West

Granted

-

L38/264

32.6

    20 years

3-Feb-17

2-Feb-38

100%

100%

South

Application

-

L38/287

95.8

20 years

-

-

100%

100%

South Western

Application

-

E38/3247

350.3

5 years

-

-

100%

100%

Lake Ballard










West

Granted

-

E29/912

607.0

5 years

10-Apr-15

10-Apr-20

100%

100%

East

Granted

-

E29/913

73.2

5 years

10-Apr-15

10-Apr-20

100%

100%

North

Granted

-

E29/948

94.5

5 years

22-Sep-15

21-Sep-20

100%

100%

South

Granted

-

E29/958

30.0

5 years

20-Jan-16

19-Jan-21

100%

100%

South East

Granted

Granted

E29/1011

68.2

5 years

11-Aug-17

10-Aug-22

100%

100%

South East

Application

Application Lodged

E29/1020

9.3

-

-

-

-

100%

South East

Application

Application Lodged

E29/1021

27.9

-

-

-

-

100%

South East

Application

Application Lodged

E29/1022

43.4

-

-

-

-

100%

Lake Irwin










West

Granted

-

E37/1233

203.0

5 years

08-Mar-16

07-Mar-21

100%

100%

Central

Granted

-

E39/1892

203.0

5 years

23-Mar-16

22-Mar-21

100%

100%

East

Granted

-

E38/3087

139.2

5 years

23-Mar-16

22-Mar-21

100%

100%

North

Granted

-

E37/1261

107.3

5 years

14-Oct-16

13-Oct-21

100%

100%

Central East

Granted

-

E38/3113

203.0

5 years

14-Oct-16

13-Oct-21

100%

100%

South

Granted

-

E39/1955

118.9

5 years

14-Oct-16

13-Oct-21

100%

100%

North West

Application

-

E37/1260

203.0

-

-

-

100%

100%

South West

Application

-

E39/1956

110.2

-

-

-

100%

100%

Lake Minigwal










West

Granted

-

E39/1893

246.2

5 years

01-Apr-16

31-Mar-21

100%

100%

East

Granted

-

E39/1894

158.1

5 years

01-Apr-16

31-Mar-21

100%

100%

Central

Granted

-

E39/1962

369.0

5 years

8-Nov-16

7-Nov-21

100%

100%

Central East

Granted

-

E39/1963

93.0

5 years

8-Nov-16

7-Nov-21

100%

100%

South

Granted

-

E39/1964

99.0

5 years

8-Nov-16

7-Nov-21

100%

100%

South West

Application

-

E39/1965

89.9

-

-

-

100%

100%

Lake Way










Central

Granted

-

E53/1878

217.0

5 years

12-Oct-16

11-Oct-21

100%

100%

South

Application

-

E53/1897

77.5

-

-

-

100%

100%

Lake Marmion










North

Granted

-

E29/1000

167.4

5 years

03-Apr-17

02-Apr-22

100%

100%

Central

Granted

-

E29/1001

204.6

5 years

03-Apr-17

02-Apr-22

100%

100%

South

Granted

Granted

E29/1002

186.0

5 years

15-Aug-17

14-Aug-22

100%

100%

West

Granted

Granted

E29/1005

68.2

5 years

11-Jul-17

10-Jul-22

100%

100%

Lake Noondie










North

Application

-

E57/1062

217.0

-

-

-

100%

100%

Central

Application

-

E57/1063

217.0

-

-

-

100%

100%

South

Application

-

E57/1064

55.8

-

-

-

100%

100%

West

Application

-

E57/1065

120.9

-

-

-

100%

100%

Lake Barlee










North

Application

-

E49/495

217.0

-

-

-

100%

100%

Central

Application

-

E49/496

220.1

-

-

-

100%

100%

South

Application

-

E77/2441

173.6

-

-

-

100%

100%

Lake Raeside










North

Application

-

E37/1305

155.0

-

-

-

100%

100%

Northern Territory









Lake Lewis










South

Granted

-

EL 29787

146.4

6 years

08-Jul-13

7-Jul-19

100%

100%

North

Granted

-

EL 29903

125.1

6 years

21-Feb-14

20-Feb-19

100%

100%

 

  

APPENDIX 1 - LAKE BALLARD TEST PIT LOCATION DATA

Hole_ID

East

North

EOH


Hole_ID

East

North

EOH

LBTT001

324838

6732081

3.5


LBTT064

321502

6728412

4.1

LBTT002

324841

6732282

3.5


LBTT065

321703

6728389

4.2

LBTT003

324840

6732480

3.5


LBTT066

321909

6728367

4.2

LBTT004

324839

6732688

3.5


LBTT067

322100

6728344

4.2

LBTT005

324839

6732881

3.5


LBTT068

319222

6730192

4.1

LBTT006

324840

6733080

4.3


LBTT069

319004

6730195

4.2

LBTT007

324838

6733285

4


LBTT070

318802

6730198

4.3

LBTT008

324844

6733481

4.3


LBTT071

318604

6730200

4.2

LBTT009

324840

6733680

3.5


LBTT072

318364

6731106

4.2

LBTT010

324844

6733880

4.1


LBTT073

318513

6731235

5.5

LBTT011

324848

6734075

4.1


LBTT074

318664

6731366

4.2

LBTT012

324853

6734274

4.2


LBTT075

318810

6731492

4.2

LBTT013

324860

6734472

4.2


LBTT076

318936

6731596

4.2

LBTT014

324869

6734673

4.3


LBTT077

319077

6731719

4.2

LBTT015

324875

6734875

4.6


LBTT078

319224

6731844

4.3

LBTT016

324648

6734154

4.3


LBTT079

319344

6731947

4.2

LBTT017

324447

6734155

4.3


LBTT080

319491

6732075

4.2

LBTT018

324250

6734155

4.3


LBTT081

319626

6732190

4

LBTT019

324047

6734155

4.3


LBTT082

319787

6732309

3.5

LBTT020

323847

6734155

2.5


LBTT083

319908

6732429

3.5

LBTT021

323650

6734155

4


LBTT084

320056

6732555

3.5

LBTT022

323447

6734155

4


LBTT085

320222

6732698

3

LBTT023

323249

6734154

4.3


LBTT086

320363

6732820

3.5

LBTT024

323047

6734155

4.3


LBTT087

320625

6733158

3.5

LBTT025

323838

6734261

4.3


LBTT088

320750

6733291

3.5

LBTT026

323839

6734212

4.2


LBTT089

318231

6731373

3

LBTT027

323845

6734107

4.3


LBTT090

318381

6731395

3

LBTT028

323847

6734054

4.3


LBTT091

318440

6731314

3

LBTT029

322938

6730204

4.3


LBTT092

318527

6731292

3

LBTT030

322735

6730202

4.2


LBTT093

318556

6731270

3

LBTT031

322531

6730201

4.3


LBTT094

318563

6731230

3

LBTT032

322331

6730190

4.3


LBTT095

318543

6731201

3

LBTT033

322133

6730194

4.3


LBTT096

318510

6731192

3

LBTT034

321932

6730193

4.2


LBTT097

318480

6731207

3

LBTT035

321732

6730186

4.2


LBTT098

318464

6731237

4.1

LBTT036

321529

6730189

4


LBTT099

316105

6731412

4.2

LBTT037

321336

6730180

4


LBTT100

316051

6731653

5.5

LBTT038

321137

6730178

4.3


LBTT101

315997

6731866

5

LBTT039

320936

6730174

4.3


LBTT102

315946

6732059

6

LBTT040

320727

6730173

4.3


LBTT103

315997

6731866

5

LBTT041

320527

6730170

4.3


LBTT104

315855

6732440

5.5

LBTT042

320330

6730167

4.3


LBTT105

315815

6732626

6

LBTT043

320136

6730166

4.1


LBTT106

315764

6732827

6

LBTT044

319937

6730160

4.2


LBTT107

315704

6733021

6

LBTT045

319738

6730151

4.2


LBTT108

315620

6733218

66

LBTT046

320132

6730100

4.2


LBTT109

315603

6733390

5.6

LBTT047

320136

6730206

4.2


LBTT110

315538

6733588

6

LBTT048

320126

6729902

4.3


LBTT111

315476

6733775

5.5

LBTT049

320258

6730012

4.2


LBTT112

315395

6733959

5.5

LBTT050

318601

6728705

4.3


LBTT113

315314

6734154

5.5

LBTT051

318807

6728688

4.3


LBTT115

315240

6734314

5.8

LBTT052

319001

6728663

3.5


LBTT116

316375

6734039

5.8

LBTT053

319201

6728663

3.5


LBTT117

316521

6734168

3.8

LBTT054

319406

6728628

3.5


LBTT118

316666

6734306

5.5

LBTT055

319603

6728608

3.5


LBTT119

316817

673445

5.5

LBTT056

319804

6728588

3.5


LBTT120

316962

6734577

5.8

LBTT057

320003

6728568

4.3


LBTT121

317107

6734708

5.8

LBTT058

320209

6728546

4


LBTT122

317251

6734840

6

LBTT063

321301

6728433

4.3


LBTT123

317399

6734975

6

LBTT124

317694

6732520

6


LBTT143

312850

6735049

5.5

LBTT125

317839

6735385

6


LBTT144

312822

6734850

6

LBTT126

317986

6735519

3.2


LBTT145

312797

6734660

5.6

LBTT127

318137

6735660

2.2


LBTT146

313435

6734436

5.5

LBTT128

318282

6735794

2.2


LBTT147

313401

6734248

5.7

LBTT129

318428

6735928

5.5


LBTT148

313373

6734052

6

LBTT130

318574

6736061

5.7


LBTT149

313340

6733847

2.1

LBTT131

313153

6737408

5.5


LBTT150

313323

6733652

1.8

LBTT132

313132

6737224

5.5


LBTT151

313294

6733456

6

LBTT133

313105

6737027

6


LBTT152

313263

6733261

6

LBTT134

313082

6736829

5.7


LBTT153

313237

6733066

6

LBTT135

313051

6736634

4.2


LBTT154

313199

6732870

6

LBTT136

313029

6736432

6


LBTT155

313175

6732666

6

LBTT137

313004

6736240

6


LBTT156

313143

6732468

5.7

LBTT138

312977

6736040

6


LBTT157

313111

6732280

6

LBTT139

312951

6735843

6


LBTT158

313085

6792071

6.5

LBTT140

312932

6735648

6


LBTT159

313057

6731878

6.3

LBTT141

312898

6735453

6


LBTT160

313025

6731681

6.3

LBTT142

312874

6735244

3.5






 

APPENDIX 2 - LAKE BALLARD BRINE CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS

HOLE ID

From

 (m)

To

(m)

K

(kg/m3)

Cl

(kg/m3)

Na

(kg/m3)

Ca

(kg/m3)

Mg

(kg/m3)

SO4

(kg/m3)

TDS

(g/kg)

LBTT011

0

4.1

2.130

159.000

86.300

0.938

8.380

7.350

263.350

LBTT014

0

4.3

1.770

123.250

69.500

0.892

5.700

5.220

208.200

LBTT015

0

4.6

1.040

70.750

40.300

0.735

3.210

3.510

118.100

LBTT016

0

4.3

1.770

126.600

70.500

1.050

5.820

5.490

207.650

LBTT017

0

4.3

2.040

145.850

81.500

1.050

7.100

6.210

233.400

LBTT018

0

4.3

2.060

142.200

82.300

1.070

6.980

6.150

230.650

LBTT019

0

4.3

2.140

154.250

86.200

1.040

7.840

7.110

246.850

LBTT020

0

2.5

2.050

147.250

80.500

1.080

7.300

6.450

240.150

LBTT021

0

4

1.870

131.150

73.600

1.140

6.200

5.910

213.000

LBTT022

0

4

1.760

119.600

66.700

1.080

5.540

5.400

195.000

LBTT023

0

4.3

1.730

120.300

66.400

1.070

5.570

5.310

200.650

LBTT024

0

4.3

1.740

122.200

66.600

1.050

5.570

5.310

202.400

LBTT025

0

4.3

2.200

151.100

87.900

1.120

7.470

7.260

247.650

LBTT026

0

4.2

2.140

144.150

82.200

1.160

6.750

6.510

232.200

LBTT027

0

4.3

2.110

145.000

83.200

1.090

7.030

6.720

241.750

LBTT028

0

4.3

2.110

145.000

81.100

1.170

6.880

6.450

240.600

LBTT030

0

4.2

2.350

159.150

90.400

1.200

7.900

7.620

261.050

LBTT031

0

4.3

2.160

160.050

89.600

1.180

7.830

7.470

266.250

LBTT043

0

4.1

2.040

155.650

88.300

1.050

8.040

8.580

262.350

LBTT046

0

4.2

1.490

109.450

63.400

1.570

5.380

7.650

185.600

LBTT047

0

4.2

1.720

129.300

74.500

1.310

6.440

8.250

223.850

LBTT050

0

4.3

1.390

96.900

60.100

1.440

3.940

5.820

162.200

LBTT053

0

3.5

2.040

154.200

91.900

1.120

7.830

9.030

261.900

LBTT054

0

3.5

1.980

154.400

88.700

1.100

7.590

8.550

260.600

LBTT055

0

3.5

2.080

153.850

90.600

1.210

7.230

7.860

261.800

LBTT056

0

3.5

1.900

152.600

90.700

1.010

7.990

9.360

259.750

LBTT057

0

4.3

2.180

159.350

94.200

1.130

7.670

8.250

271.000

LBTT058

0

4

2.170

153.500

90.000

1.310

6.450

6.480

260.050

LBTT059

0

4

2.000

157.550

93.600

1.070

7.800

9.000

251.900

LBTT060

0

4

1.940

153.500

88.700

1.110

7.770

8.640

246.250

LBTT061

0

4

1.960

152.800

86.400

1.060

7.830

8.790

241.550

LBTT063

0

4.3

2.110

156.700

89.800

1.090

7.860

8.370

247.000

LBTT064

0

4.1

2.080

157.050

89.600

1.150

7.390

8.130

247.650

LBTT065

0

4.2

2.070

150.150

88.600

1.280

6.860

7.560

238.450

LBTT071

0

4.2

2.170

159.700

93.500

1.030

7.970

8.910

255.650

LBTT072

0

4.2

2.100

160.400

94.500

1.070

7.650

9.090

264.350

LBTT073

0

5.5

2.020

155.800

92.100

1.060

7.280

8.580

252.350

LBTT074

0

4.2

1.940

153.700

88.900

1.170

7.020

8.400

259.700

LBTT075

0

4.2

2.050

158.450

94.200

1.130

7.280

8.400

266.500

LBTT076

0

4.2

1.970

150.300

86.600

1.230

6.570

7.650

241.450

LBTT076

0

4.2

2.010

151.400

90.400

1.260

6.610

7.800

249.350

LBTT077

0

4.2

2.000

156.350

93.400

1.060

7.440

8.640

251.450

LBTT078

0

4.3

1.900

155.100

90.000

1.090

7.360

8.430

247.050

LBTT079

0

4.2

1.930

158.800

90.100

1.020

7.540

8.580

255.450

LBTT080

0

4.2

1.920

155.250

88.800

1.020

7.880

9.270

252.550

LBTT081

0

4

1.870

151.200

87.100

1.100

7.830

9.600

247.750

LBTT082

0

3.5

1.890

151.050

88.300

1.020

8.230

9.600

247.200

LBTT082

0

3.5

1.900

150.700

87.300

1.020

8.170

10.000

248.350

LBTT083

0

3.5

1.940

157.950

91.700

0.935

8.690

10.200

263.600

LBTT084

0

3.5

1.960

158.300

91.000

0.892

9.080

10.700

268.350

LBTT099

0

4.2

1.980

162.250

95.200

0.978

7.950

8.340

268.000

LBTT100

0

5.5

2.040

160.300

90.700

0.996

7.950

8.100

266.000

LBTT100

0

5.5

2.040

160.300

90.700

0.996

7.950

8.100

266.000

LBTT101

0

5

2.040

158.200

88.200

1.020

7.950

8.100

263.000

LBTT103

0

5

2.050

162.100

93.600

0.987

8.340

8.970

269.000

LBTT105

0

6

2.070

168.200

98.700

0.862

8.850

9.390

280.000

LBTT106

0

6

2.030

158.050

94.000

1.060

7.890

8.820

263.000

LBTT107

0

6

2.050

164.900

95.000

0.918

8.550

9.360

273.000

LBTT109

0

5.6

2.030

163.150

96.800

0.935

8.230

9.060

272.000

LBTT110

0

6

2.010

155.400

91.700

1.070

7.490

7.890

259.000

LBTT112

0

5.5

2.080

161.550

92.700

0.959

8.200

8.580

269.000

LBTT113

0

5.5

2.160

166.300

96.500

0.909

8.790

8.880

278.000

LBTT114

0

5.8

2.160

165.250

96.500

0.949

8.500

8.970

276.000

LBTT115

0

5.8

2.190

158.900

91.100

1.020

8.080

8.190

265.000

LBTT116

0

3.8

2.130

156.300

91.100

1.030

7.550

7.680

261.000

LBTT119

0

5.8

2.230

163.850

95.600

1.140

8.120

8.220

273.000

LBTT123

0

6

2.070

154.700

92.800

1.050

7.450

8.190

258.000

LBTT125

0

6

2.030

150.150

85.100

1.070

7.390

7.920

251.000

LBTT126

0

3.2

1.960

144.900

85.600

1.330

6.520

6.900

243.000

LBTT127

0

2.2

2.050

146.650

87.100

1.290

6.830

7.080

246.000

LBTT128

0

2.2

2.040

145.450

87.100

1.300

6.710

7.140

243.000

LBTT129

0

5.5

2.080

151.900

88.000

1.180

7.110

7.410

256.000

LBTT131

0

5.5

1.310

96.700

58.000

0.996

4.420

5.250

163.000

LBTT132

0

5.5

2.060

153.150

91.800

1.170

6.850

7.110

258.000

LBTT133

0

6

2.060

158.750

94.600

1.020

7.470

8.400

269.000

LBTT134

0

5.7

2.100

161.050

94.300

1.030

7.490

7.740

271.000

LBTT135

0

4.2

2.110

159.800

93.400

1.020

7.390

8.160

270.000

LBTT136

0

6

2.040

156.450

91.400

1.020

7.460

8.040

263.000

LBTT142

0

3.5

1.970

152.600

89.700

0.959

7.650

8.340

257.000

LBTT143

0

5.5

1.950

154.900

91.600

0.968

7.570

8.910

261.000

LBTT145

0

5.6

1.780

140.700

86.100

1.090

6.030

7.080

238.000

LBTT149

0

2.1

1.720

147.700

84.700

0.993

6.650

7.710

253.000

LBTT150

0

1.8

1.750

148.400

86.700

1.060

6.950

8.520

257.000

LBTT156

0

5.7

1.860

156.650

89.800

0.939

7.900

9.060

270.000

 

A0PPENDIX 3 - LAKE WELLS BRINE CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS

HOLE ID

From

 (m)

To

(m)

K

(kg/m3)

Cl

(kg/m3)

Na

(kg/m3)

Ca

(kg/m3)

Mg

(kg/m3)

SO4

(kg/m3)

TDS

(g/kg)

Trench P1g

0

4

4.520

162.400

97.800

0.646

6.600

14.400

288.000

Trench P2b

0

2.8

4.500

145.350

90.700

0.498

6.870

20.400

273.100

Trench P2b

0

2.8

5.920

185.600

112.000

0.394

8.610

18.200

332.100

Trench P2b

0

2.8

2.570

137.950

86.100

1.020

3.600

9.480

239.150

Trench P2a

0

2.2

9.150

186.150

104.000

0.300

12.600

26.200

341.400

Trench P2a

0

2.2

6.030

188.250

108.000

0.409

8.050

17.400

333.550

Trench P2a

0

2.2

5.810

187.700

110.000

0.426

7.780

16.700

333.300

Trench P2a

0

2.2

5.880

189.800

109.000

0.393

7.820

17.200

333.850

Trench P2a

0

2.2

5.850

188.400

113.000

0.435

7.840

17.200

334.100

Trench P2a

0

2.2

5.760

188.050

109.000

0.425

7.740

17.000

334.700

Trench P2a

0

2.2

5.990

188.950

110.000

0.412

8.000

17.800

334.250

Trench P2a

0

2.2

5.870

187.900

109.000

0.417

7.760

17.500

333.500

Trench P2a

0

2.2

5.700

180.000

108.000

0.432

7.550

17.300

333.500

Trench P2b

0

2.8

5.140

172.650

103.000

0.520

7.470

16.400

307.300

Trench P2a

0

2.2

4.920

163.350

95.500

0.584

7.140

15.700

293.500

Trench P2b

0

2.8

5.060

166.700

101.000

0.568

7.320

17.000

298.250

Trench P2b

0

2.8

4.910

163.200

95.100

0.578

7.110

16.000

294.150

Trench P2a

0

2.2

5.650

178.250

106.000

0.482

7.370

16.700

319.400

Trench P2b

0

2.8

4.980

164.050

98.500

0.567

7.160

16.300

295.250

Trench P2b

0

2.8

4.820

160.750

96.600

0.580

6.930

15.400

288.000

Trench P2b

0

2.8

4.830

161.450

94.100

0.569

6.960

15.900

291.150

Trench P2b

0

2.8

4.820

160.200

94.700

0.583

6.950

15.700

286.150

Trench P2b

0

2.8

4.860

161.950

96.300

0.578

6.970

15.700

289.850

Trench P2b

0

2.8

4.770

161.450

96.700

0.594

6.970

15.700

287.700

Trench P2b

0

2.8

4.730

160.050

95.000

0.594

6.810

15.200

287.300

Trench P2c

0

3

4.930

100.000

157.500

0.530

6.500

19.100

287.900

Trench P2c

0

3

4.330

87.500

141.550

0.626

5.800

17.300

260.200

Trench P2c

0

3

4.370

87.300

142.050

0.630

5.820

17.300

259.350

Trench P2c

0

3

4.350

87.600

138.200

0.644

5.750

17.300

255.050

Trench P2c

0

3

4.290

85.300

138.400

0.636

5.730

17.100

255.450

Trench P2c

0

3

4.260

85.500

138.900

0.632

5.730

17.000

254.400

Trench P2c

0

3

4.260

84.100

138.400

0.626

5.630

16.800

254.650

Trench P2c

0

3

4.340

85.500

139.100

0.633

5.730

17.200

254.850

Trench P2c

0

3

4.230

87.000

138.050

0.663

5.740

17.900

255.350

Trench P2c

0

3

4.240

87.400

139.600

0.656

5.760

17.100

253.850

Trench P2c

0

3

4.250

87.300

138.900

0.654

5.800

17.200

254.150

Trench P2c

0

3

4.310

88.000

141.550

0.648

5.850

17.500

254.900

Trench P2c

0

3

4.460

89.900

142.100

0.666

6.000

17.900

257.550

 

APPENDIX 4 - JORC TABLE ONE

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Lake Wells and Lake Ballard

Geological samples were obtained from the excavator bucket at regular depth intervals.

Brine samples were taken from the discharge of trench dewatering pumps.

 

Drilling techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

Lake Wells and Lake Ballard

Excavation with a low ground pressure excavator.

 

 

Drill sample recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

Lake Wells and Lake Ballard

Not applicable for trenching.

 

 

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

Lake Wells and Lake Ballard

All trenches and test pits were geologically logged qualitatively by a qualified geologist, noting in particular moisture content of sediments, lithology, colour, induration, grainsize and shape, matrix and structural observations. Flow rate data was logged to note water inflow zones.

 

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

Brine samples were taken from the discharge of trench dewatering pumps.

Sample bottles are rinsed with brine which is discarded prior to sampling.

All brine samples taken in the field are split into two sub-samples: primary and duplicate.  Reference samples were analysed at a separate laboratory for QA/QC.

Representative chip trays and bulk lithological samples are kept for records.

 

 

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

Primary samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Minerals Laboratory, Perth. 

Brine samples were analysed using ICP-AES for K, Na, Mg, Ca, with chloride determined by Mohr titration and alkalinity determined volumetrically. Sulphate was calculated from the ICP-AES sulphur analysis.

 

Verification of sampling and assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

Data entry is done in the field to minimise transposition errors.

Brine assay results are received from the laboratory in digital format, these data sets are subject to the quality control described above.  All laboratory results are entered in to the company's database and validation completed.

Independent verification of significant intercepts was not considered warranted given the relatively consistent nature of the brine.

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

Trench and test pit co-ordinates were captured using hand held GPS.

Coordinates were provided in GDA 94_MGA Zone 51.

Topographic control is obtained using Geoscience Australia's 1-second digital elevation product.

 

Data spacing and distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

Lake Wells and Lake Ballard

Trench hole spacing is shown on the attached maps and varies due to irregular access along the lake edge.

 

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

Trenches and test pits were vertical. Geological structure is considered to be flat lying.

 

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.

All brine samples were marked and kept onsite before transport to the laboratory.

All remaining sample and duplicates are stored in the Perth office in climate-controlled conditions.

Chain of Custody system is maintained.

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

Data review is summarised in Quality of assay data, laboratory tests and Verification of sampling and assaying. No audits were undertaken.

 

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

 

Lake Wells

Tenements excavated were granted exploration licences 38/2710, 38/2821, 38/2824, 38/3055, 38/3056 and 38/3057 in Western Australia.

 

Lake Ballard

Tenements sampled 29/912, 29/913, 29/948 and 29/958 in Western Australia.

Exploration Licenses are held by Piper Preston Pty Ltd (fully owned subsidiary of ASLP).

Exploration done by other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

No other known exploration has occurred on the Exploration Licenses.

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

Salt Lake Brine Deposit

 

 

 

 

 

Drill hole Information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

o   easting and northing of the drill hole collar

o   elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

o   dip and azimuth of the hole

o   down hole length and interception depth

o   hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

Lake Wells and Lake Ballard

Details are presented in the report.

 

 

Data aggregation methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

Within the salt lake extent no low grade cut-off or high grade capping has been implemented.

 

Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').

Lake Wells and Lake Ballard

The unit is flat lying and trenches and pits are vertical hence the intersected downhole depth is equivalent to the inferred thickness of mineralisation.

 

 

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

Addressed in the announcement.

Balanced reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

All results have been included.

Other substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

Gravity survey was completed by Atlas Geophysics using a Hi Target V100 GNSS receiver for accurate positioning and CG-5 Digital Automated Gravity Meter.   

Gravity data was gained using the contractors rapid acquisition, high accuracy UTV borne techniques.  The company's own in-house reduction and QA software was used to reduce the data on a daily basis to ensure quality and integrity.  All gravity meters were calibrated pre and post survey and meter drift rates were monitored daily.  3 to 5 % of the stations are repeated for quality control.

Western Geophysics were engaged to manage and process the gravity survey.  Processing the survey involved reducing the gravity data and integrating to the regional data to a residual anomaly which shows there is a semi-continuous distinct residual gravity low of negative 2 to 2.5 milligals present along eastern to central areas to the entire tenement area.

Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

Further trench testing and numerical hydrogeological modelling to be completed that incorporates the results of the test pumping.  The model will be the basis of the annual brine abstraction rate and mine life.


Further sampling and drilling to assess the occurrence of brine at depth.

Closer spaced, more evenly distribute drilling, particularly to define the thickness of the LPS unit.

Hydraulic testing be undertaken, for instance pumping tests from bores and/or trenches to determine, aquifer properties, expected production rates and infrastructure design (trench and bore size and spacing).

Lake recharge dynamics be studied to determine the lake water balance and subsequent production water balance. For instance simultaneous data recording of rainfall and subsurface brine level fluctuations to understand the relationship between rainfall and lake recharge, and hence the brine recharge dynamics of the Lake.

Study of the potential solid phase soluble or exchangeable potassium resource.

 

For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:

 

Sam Cordin

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +61 8 9322 6322

Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Daniel Bush

Grant Thornton UK LLP(Nominated Adviser)

Tel: +44 (0)207 383 5100

Nick Tulloch/Beth McKiernan

Cenkos Securities plc (Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939

 


This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
 
END
 
 
QRFURSORBUAROAA

Top of Page